Skip to main content

The Court Jester Whose Wit Saved His Life

How a court jester slapped the king's butt, then brilliantly convinced him not to kill him Triboulet served as court jester under King Francis I, who ruled France from 1515 to 1547 . Triboulet's quick humor rescued him from Francis I's deadly wrath, not once, but twice. Court jesters hold a unique place in history. Playing the fool for kings and queens meant they were always in close proximity to royalty, but so very far from their rank and station. Comedians often like to push boundaries, but that can be a dangerous business when your job is to entertain the peope who have executioners at their beck and call. Especially when you forget your place—or purposely ignore it, as the case may be—and playfully smack the reigning monarch square on the behind. That little whoopsie was the claim to fame of Triboulet, a court jester who served King Francis I in 16th-century France. But it was how he got away with slapping the king on the butt and living to tell about it that earne...

Tickling Torture

Tickling Torture: The Horrible Method That Can Cause An Aneurysm

Death By Tickling The Horrible Torture Method That Can Cause An Aneurysm
Death By Tickling The Horrible Torture Method That Can Cause An Aneurysm


Have you ever been in pain—and I mean pain—from being tickled? Have you been the victim of a bully who enjoyed watching you squirm in laughter by stroking your ribs or armpits? You probably have laughed uncontrollably against your will until you cried and thought, “who the hell could actually find tickling fun?”

Indeed, tickling isn’t inherently fun. It may sound like a joke, but tickling is a legitimate torture method that, in the most extreme cases, can even result in death. It can be used to abuse, dominate, harass, humiliate, or interrogate an individual, so it is a serious thing. We’re not exaggerating here: tickling is bloody torturous. That seemingly harmless activity we’ve engaged in for centuries may appear benign (when executed in a safe and friendly circumstance), but it is arguably one of the worst forms of torture someone could be submitted to.

Sure, that sounds strange. We’re used to hearing a lot about the methods governments have used—and use still—to torture victims and extract information. You wouldn’t think death by tickling is one of them. But it is. Though perhaps one of the strangest, this method can prove highly effective—and highly lethal.

Tickling Torture


Though laughter is ordinarily a pleasant and welcomed reaction when it’s brought about by tickling, it can generate acute and severe stress since laughter is, fun or not, inevitable. The one being tickled laughs whether they want it or not, despite of whether they find the experience pleasant or not. In these cases, laughter can indicate a panic reflex rather than a pleasurable response.

Forced tickle can cause real physical and mental distress. The tickled person completely loses control over their body and their system enters a state of tension, fatigue, and anxiety. So, even if it doesn’t look as dangerous as being physically mistreated with punches or some special machine designed to maximize pain, it can in some cases result in a brutal death regardless.

One of the most famous warnings against this strange method was remarked by the researcher Irene Thompson in her book A to Z of Punishment and Torture. Called the “Chinese tickling torture,” it was practiced mostly during the Han Dynasty (206-220 AD). It was used as a subtle method of punishment against criminals and traitors since it didn’t leave any marks and the victim could almost always recover fully. It is believed this method was used at other time periods, but no general register exists to point to cases where it led to death. Indeed, this result is uncommon. According to Mark Schreiber, another researcher and analyst, in Japan people used to tickle any criminal “mercilessly.”

Tickling Torture


Thompson also points out that a similar method was used in Ancient Rome against other sorts of lawbreakers. The victim’s feet were submerged in a kind of salt mixture and were subdued as a goat licked the substance. According to Thompson, this procedure caused laughter at first, yet soon became unbearable and extremely painful. The method was not carried out in Rome alone, but seems to have been implemented in several other European nations in several distinct periods. There is, however, no clear record on the matter, so it’s impossible to know how many deaths it caused.

Some believe this method didn’t cause any deaths at all, since constant laughter can lead to fainting before the victim suffers lethally from bodily stress. However, there are in fact records of death-inducing tickling. Josef Kohout, a homosexual prisoner in World War II, claimed to have witnessed Nazi officers tortured a fellow prisoner through tickling until he died. Likewise, in a 1842 article, a historian known simply as L.G.C. spoke of another kind of torture, comparing it with tickling, and pointed out that “even tickling the feet has commonly caused death.”

Tickling Torture


It is possible to die of laughter, specifically due to a heart attack, asphyxia, or even brain aneurysms—or other stress-related injuries. As previously mentioned, the individual loses control of his or her body and, unable to regulate their breathing and being subdued by stress, any of said harms can occur—depending on the intensity and duration of the torture.

In fact, there are multiple cases of people who’ve died from laughter attacks, which can alone serve as proof that death by tickling is not as far-fetched as you might think. So… if someone wants to physically force a laugh out of you, now you have the perfect excuse to stop them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Court Jester Whose Wit Saved His Life

How a court jester slapped the king's butt, then brilliantly convinced him not to kill him Triboulet served as court jester under King Francis I, who ruled France from 1515 to 1547 . Triboulet's quick humor rescued him from Francis I's deadly wrath, not once, but twice. Court jesters hold a unique place in history. Playing the fool for kings and queens meant they were always in close proximity to royalty, but so very far from their rank and station. Comedians often like to push boundaries, but that can be a dangerous business when your job is to entertain the peope who have executioners at their beck and call. Especially when you forget your place—or purposely ignore it, as the case may be—and playfully smack the reigning monarch square on the behind. That little whoopsie was the claim to fame of Triboulet, a court jester who served King Francis I in 16th-century France. But it was how he got away with slapping the king on the butt and living to tell about it that earne...

Arne Cheyenne Johnson

Arne Cheyenne Johnson: The Devil Made Me Do It Arne Cheyenne Johnson claimed that possession by the Devil had led him to murder Born on February 26, 1952, Arne Cheyenne Johnson holds a somewhat strange claim to fame. He was the first person in the United States to claim demonic possession as a defense in a criminal trial. After being arrested for the murder of his landlord, Alan Bono, in 1981 Johnson claimed, “the Devil made him do it”. Unsurprisingly, his trial became a media sensation at the time and Johnson became a household name. Amazingly, two famous paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, came to his defense, arguing at trial that Johnson truly was possessed. For decades this has left some wondering if Johnson was guilty or if the devil really made him do it. The Murder To an outsider, it would seem everything was going okay for Arne Johnson in early 1981. He was happily engaged to Debbie Glatzel, had just moved into a new home, and was working as a tree surgeon at...

Sending kids in the mail

When People Used the Postal Service to ‘Mail’ Their Children A U.S. POSTMAN CARRYING A BABY BOY ALONG WITH HIS LETTERS In the early days of U.S. parcel service, there weren’t clear guidelines about what you could and couldn’t mail. In January 1913, one Ohio couple took advantage of the U.S. Postal Service’s new parcel service to make a very special delivery: their infant son. The Beagues paid 15 cents for his stamps and an unknown amount to insure him for $50, then handed him over to the mailman, who dropped the boy off at his grandmother’s house about a mile away. Regulations about what you could and couldn’t send through the mail were vague when post offices began accepting parcels over four pounds on January 1, 1913. People immediately started testing its limits by mailing eggs, bricks, snakes and other unusual “packages.” So were people allowed to mail their children? Technically, there was no postal regulation against it. “The first few years of parcel post service—it was a bi...